Athlon II X4 630 vs Pentium N4200

AMD

Athlon II X4 630

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium N4200

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······

Athlon II X4 630 vs Pentium N4200 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X4 630 vs Pentium N4200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X4 630 vs Pentium N4200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X4 630

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $32 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
  • Delivers 25.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 13.4 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium N4200.

Trade-offs

  • 4650% higher power demand at 95W vs 2W.

Pentium N4200

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 2W instead of 95W, a 93W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,158 vs 2,175).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.4 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($161 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 630.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X4 630 better than Pentium N4200?
Yes. Athlon II X4 630 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Athlon II X4 630 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X4 630 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon II X4 630 is the better buy right now. Athlon II X4 630 comes in $32 cheaper on MSRP at $129 MSRP versus $161 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 25.8% better value on MSRP (16.9 vs 13.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium N4200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X4 630 vs Pentium N4200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon II X4 630

The Athlon II X4 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,175 points. Launch price was $63.

Intel

Pentium N4200

The Pentium N4200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,158 points. Launch price was $161.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X4 630 and Pentium N4200 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X4 630 versus 2.5 GHz on the Pentium N4200 — a 11.3% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 630 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Athlon II X4 630 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium N4200 uses Apollo Lake (2014−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 630 scores 2,175 against the Pentium N4200's 2,158 — a 0.8% lead for the Athlon II X4 630. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 630 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium N4200.

FeatureAthlon II X4 630Pentium N4200
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+12%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+155%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
2 MB+300%
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Propus (2009−2011)
Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
PassMark
2,175
2,158
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X4 630 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium N4200 uses FCBGA1296 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon II X4 630Pentium N4200
Socket
AM3
FCBGA1296
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 630) / not specified (Pentium N4200).

FeatureAthlon II X4 630Pentium N4200
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X4 630 was priced at $129, while the Pentium N4200 came in at $161. On launch pricing ($129 vs $161), Athlon II X4 630 was $32 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 630 delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 13.4 pts/$ for the Pentium N4200 — making the Athlon II X4 630 the 22.8% better value option.

FeatureAthlon II X4 630Pentium N4200
MSRP
$129-20%
$161
Performance per Dollar
16.9+26%
13.4
Release Date
2009
2016

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.