CPU
GPU
Athlon II X4 630
Celeron G5900T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Athlon II X4 630 is positioned at rank #868 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 630
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G5900T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II X4 630 | Celeron G5900T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II X4 630 | Celeron G5900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+231%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X4 630 and Celeron G5900T
Athlon II X4 630
The Athlon II X4 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,175 points. Launch price was $63.
Celeron G5900T
The Celeron G5900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,192 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 630 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G5900T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X4 630 has 2 more cores. The Athlon II X4 630 is built on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 630 scores 2,175 against the Celeron G5900T's 2,192 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron G5900T. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 630 vs 2 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5900T.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Celeron G5900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | — |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | — |
| PassMark | 2,175 | 2,192 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 748 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 750 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 630 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G5900T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 630 versus DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5900T — the Celeron G5900T supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5900T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Socket AM3 (Athlon II X4 630) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5900T).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Celeron G5900T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-2666+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon II X4 630 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 630) vs VT-x (Celeron G5900T). The Celeron G5900T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Athlon II X4 630 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5900T rivals Pentium Gold G6400T.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Celeron G5900T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 610 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II X4 630 launched at $129 MSRP, while the Celeron G5900T debuted at $42. At current prices ($15 vs $50), the Athlon II X4 630 is $35 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 630 delivers 145.0 pts/$ vs 43.8 pts/$ for the Celeron G5900T — making the Athlon II X4 630 the 107.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Celeron G5900T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $42-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-70% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 145.0+231% | 43.8 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X4 630 and Celeron G5900T
