CPU
GPU
Athlon II X4 630
Atom x7211RE
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X4 630 is positioned at rank 868 and the Atom x7211RE is on rank 515, so the Atom x7211RE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 630
Performance Per Dollar Atom x7211RE
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II X4 630 | Atom x7211RE |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Amston Lake (2024−2025) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II X4 630 | Atom x7211RE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X4 630 and Atom x7211RE
Athlon II X4 630
The Athlon II X4 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,175 points. Launch price was $63.
Atom x7211RE
The Atom x7211RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,188 points. Launch price was $42.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 630 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom x7211RE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X4 630 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X4 630 versus 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211RE — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Atom x7211RE (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Athlon II X4 630 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Atom x7211RE uses Amston Lake (2024−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 630 scores 2,175 against the Atom x7211RE's 2,188 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom x7211RE. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 630 vs 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211RE.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Atom x7211RE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+180% | 1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (total)+300% |
| Process | 45 nm | 10 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Amston Lake (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 2,175 | 2,188 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 630 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom x7211RE uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 630 versus LPDDR5-4800 on the Atom x7211RE — the Atom x7211RE supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom x7211RE supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon II X4 630) vs 1 (Atom x7211RE). PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon II X4 630) vs 8 (Atom x7211RE) — the Athlon II X4 630 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Socket AM3 (Athlon II X4 630) and Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7211RE).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Atom x7211RE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | FCBGA1264 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | LPDDR5-4800+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+100% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon II X4 630 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 630) vs VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7211RE). The Atom x7211RE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (16 EU)), while the Athlon II X4 630 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom x7211RE targets Embedded.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Atom x7211RE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics (16 EU) |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Embedded |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X4 630 and Atom x7211RE
