
Athlon II X4 630

Atom x7211RE
Athlon II X4 630 vs Atom x7211RE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X4 630 vs Atom x7211RE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X4 630 vs Atom x7211RE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X4 630
2009Why buy it
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Atom x7211RE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,175 vs 2,188).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Atom x7211RE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1483.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM3, while Atom x7211RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7211RE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Atom x7211RE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 95W, a 89W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of AM3 and older memory support.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (16 EU), while Athlon II X4 630 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 630.
Quick Answers
So, is Atom x7211RE better than Athlon II X4 630?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X4 630 vs Atom x7211RE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 630
The Athlon II X4 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,175 points. Launch price was $63.

Atom x7211RE
The Atom x7211RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,188 points. Launch price was $42.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 630 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom x7211RE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X4 630 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X4 630 versus 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211RE — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Atom x7211RE (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Athlon II X4 630 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Atom x7211RE uses Amston Lake (2024−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 630 scores 2,175 against the Atom x7211RE's 2,188 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom x7211RE. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 630 vs 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211RE.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Atom x7211RE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+180% | 1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (total)+300% |
| Process | 45 nm | 10 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Amston Lake (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 2,175 | 2,188 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 630 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom x7211RE uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 630 versus LPDDR5-4800 on the Atom x7211RE — the Atom x7211RE supports 260.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom x7211RE supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon II X4 630) vs 1 (Atom x7211RE). PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon II X4 630) vs 8 (Atom x7211RE) — the Athlon II X4 630 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Socket AM3 (Athlon II X4 630) and Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7211RE).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Atom x7211RE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | FCBGA1264 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | LPDDR5-4800+260% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+100% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon II X4 630 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 630) vs VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7211RE). The Atom x7211RE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (16 EU)), while the Athlon II X4 630 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom x7211RE targets Embedded.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Atom x7211RE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics (16 EU) |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Embedded |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















