Athlon II X4 630 vs Pro A10-8700B

Athlon II X4 630 vs Pro A10-8700B Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X4 630

4 / 4

2,175

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pro A10-8700B

4 / 4

2,170

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X4 630 vs Pro A10-8700B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X4 630 vs Pro A10-8700B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X4 630

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pro A10-8700B.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Pro A10-8700B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌4650% higher power demand at 95W vs 2W.

Pro A10-8700B

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 95W, a 93W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,170 vs 2,175).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 630.

Quick Answers

So, is Pro A10-8700B better than Athlon II X4 630?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pro A10-8700B is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X4 630 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X4 630 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pro A10-8700B is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pro A10-8700B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $129 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon II X4 630 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (16.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pro A10-8700B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X4 630 vs Pro A10-8700B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 630

The Athlon II X4 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,175 points. Launch price was $63.

Pro A10-8700B

The Pro A10-8700B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,170 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X4 630 and Pro A10-8700B share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X4 630 versus 3.2 GHz on the Pro A10-8700B — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Pro A10-8700B (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Athlon II X4 630 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pro A10-8700B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 630 scores 2,175 against the Pro A10-8700B's 2,170 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon II X4 630.

Feature	Athlon II X4 630	Pro A10-8700B
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	3.2 GHz+14%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+56%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2048 kB+300%
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	Propus (2009−2011)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	2,175	2,170

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X4 630 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pro A10-8700B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.