Athlon II X4 630 vs Core 2 Duo P7370

Athlon II X4 630 vs Core 2 Duo P7370 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X4 630

4 / 4

2,175

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo P7370

2 / 2

2,191

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X4 630 vs Core 2 Duo P7370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X4 630 vs Core 2 Duo P7370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X4 630

2009

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 2 Duo P7370.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,175 vs 2,191).
❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo P7370 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3066.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 3W.

Core 2 Duo P7370

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 95W, a 92W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 630.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo P7370 better than Athlon II X4 630?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X4 630 is ahead with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P7370 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P7370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo P7370 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core 2 Duo P7370 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $129 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. Athlon II X4 630 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (16.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 2 Duo P7370 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Athlon II X4 630 vs Core 2 Duo P7370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 630

The Athlon II X4 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,175 points. Launch price was $63.

Core 2 Duo P7370

The Core 2 Duo P7370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,191 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II X4 630 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo P7370 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X4 630 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X4 630 versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P7370 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 630 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Athlon II X4 630 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo P7370 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 630 scores 2,175 against the Core 2 Duo P7370's 2,191 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo P7370. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 630 vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P7370.

Feature	Athlon II X4 630	Core 2 Duo P7370
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+40%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+40%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	3 MB+500%
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Propus (2009−2011)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	2,175	2,191

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X4 630 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo P7370 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 630 versus DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo P7370 — the Athlon II X4 630 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X4 630 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Socket AM3 (Athlon II X4 630) and Mobile (Core 2 Duo P7370).

Feature	Athlon II X4 630	Core 2 Duo P7370
Socket	AM3	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+25%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon II X4 630 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 630) vs false (Core 2 Duo P7370).