Athlon II X4 630 vs Pentium G4400TE

AMD

Athlon II X4 630

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium G4400TE

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······

Athlon II X4 630 vs Pentium G4400TE Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X4 630 vs Pentium G4400TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X4 630 vs Pentium G4400TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X4 630

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $171 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 131.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium G4400TE.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,175 vs 2,190).
  • 171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Pentium G4400TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Pentium G4400TE

2015

Why buy it

  • +0.7% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 510, while Athlon II X4 630 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 630.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G4400TE better than Athlon II X4 630?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X4 630 is ahead with a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G4400TE pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G4400TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium G4400TE is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium G4400TE comes in 132.6% more expensive on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $129 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. Athlon II X4 630 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 131.0% better value on paper (16.9 vs 7.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium G4400TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X4 630 vs Pentium G4400TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon II X4 630

The Athlon II X4 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,175 points. Launch price was $63.

Intel

Pentium G4400TE

The Pentium G4400TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,190 points. Launch price was $64.

Processing Power

The Athlon II X4 630 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G4400TE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X4 630 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X4 630 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium G4400TE — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 630. The Athlon II X4 630 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium G4400TE uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 630 scores 2,175 against the Pentium G4400TE's 2,190 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium G4400TE. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 630 vs 3 MB on the Pentium G4400TE.

FeatureAthlon II X4 630Pentium G4400TE
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+17%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512 kB
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Propus (2009−2011)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
2,175
2,190
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X4 630 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G4400TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 630 versus DDR4-2133 on the Pentium G4400TE — the Pentium G4400TE supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G4400TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureAthlon II X4 630Pentium G4400TE
Socket
AM3
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-2133+60%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
64 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon II X4 630 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 630) vs VT-x (Pentium G4400TE). The Pentium G4400TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Athlon II X4 630 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G4400TE targets Desktop.

FeatureAthlon II X4 630Pentium G4400TE
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 510
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X4 630 was priced at $129, while the Pentium G4400TE came in at $300. On launch pricing ($129 vs $300), Athlon II X4 630 was $171 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 630 delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G4400TE — making the Athlon II X4 630 the 79.1% better value option.

FeatureAthlon II X4 630Pentium G4400TE
MSRP
$129-57%
$300
Performance per Dollar
16.9+132%
7.3
Release Date
2009
2015

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.