
Athlon II X4 630

Pentium G4400TE
Athlon II X4 630 vs Pentium G4400TE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X4 630 vs Pentium G4400TE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X4 630 vs Pentium G4400TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X4 630
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $171 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 131.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium G4400TE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,175 vs 2,190).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium G4400TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Pentium G4400TE
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 510, while Athlon II X4 630 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 630.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G4400TE better than Athlon II X4 630?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X4 630 vs Pentium G4400TE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 630
The Athlon II X4 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,175 points. Launch price was $63.

Pentium G4400TE
The Pentium G4400TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,190 points. Launch price was $64.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 630 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G4400TE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X4 630 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X4 630 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium G4400TE — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 630. The Athlon II X4 630 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium G4400TE uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 630 scores 2,175 against the Pentium G4400TE's 2,190 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium G4400TE. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 630 vs 3 MB on the Pentium G4400TE.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Pentium G4400TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz+17% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 2,175 | 2,190 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 630 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G4400TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 630 versus DDR4-2133 on the Pentium G4400TE — the Pentium G4400TE supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G4400TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Pentium G4400TE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-2133+60% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 64 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon II X4 630 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 630) vs VT-x (Pentium G4400TE). The Pentium G4400TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Athlon II X4 630 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G4400TE targets Desktop.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Pentium G4400TE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 510 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X4 630 was priced at $129, while the Pentium G4400TE came in at $300. On launch pricing ($129 vs $300), Athlon II X4 630 was $171 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 630 delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G4400TE — making the Athlon II X4 630 the 79.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Pentium G4400TE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-57% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.9+132% | 7.3 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















