
Athlon II X4 630

Core m3-6Y30
Athlon II X4 630 vs Core m3-6Y30 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X4 630 vs Core m3-6Y30 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X4 630 vs Core m3-6Y30: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X4 630
2009Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $152 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 117.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 7.8 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,175 vs 2,180).
Core m3-6Y30
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X4 630 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.8 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 630.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X4 630 better than Core m3-6Y30?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X4 630 vs Core m3-6Y30 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 630
The Athlon II X4 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,175 points. Launch price was $63.

Core m3-6Y30
The Core m3-6Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,180 points. Launch price was $281.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 630 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core m3-6Y30 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 630 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X4 630 versus 2.2 GHz on the Core m3-6Y30 — a 24% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 630 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 0.9 GHz). The Athlon II X4 630 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core m3-6Y30 uses Skylake-Y (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 630 scores 2,175 against the Core m3-6Y30's 2,180 — a 0.2% lead for the Core m3-6Y30. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 630 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core m3-6Y30.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Core m3-6Y30 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz+27% | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+211% | 0.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Skylake-Y (2015) |
| PassMark | 2,175 | 2,180 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 630 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core m3-6Y30 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Core m3-6Y30 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | FCBGA1515 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 630) / not specified (Core m3-6Y30).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Core m3-6Y30 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X4 630 was priced at $129, while the Core m3-6Y30 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($129 vs $281), Athlon II X4 630 was $152 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 630 delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 7.8 pts/$ for the Core m3-6Y30 — making the Athlon II X4 630 the 73.9% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Core m3-6Y30 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-54% | $281 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.9+117% | 7.8 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















