Athlon II X4 630 vs Pentium G3450

AMD

Athlon II X4 630

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium G3450

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······

Athlon II X4 630 vs Pentium G3450 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X4 630 vs Pentium G3450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X4 630 vs Pentium G3450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X4 630

2009

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium G3450.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,175 vs 2,182).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $82 MSRP).
  • 75.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 54W.

Pentium G3450

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $47 less on MSRP ($82 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • Delivers 57.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.6 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($82 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • Draws 54W instead of 95W, a 41W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 630.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G3450 better than Athlon II X4 630?
Yes. Pentium G3450 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Pentium G3450 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G3450 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium G3450 is the better buy right now. Pentium G3450 comes in $47 cheaper on MSRP at $82 MSRP versus $129 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 57.8% better value on MSRP (26.6 vs 16.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium G3450 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X4 630 vs Pentium G3450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon II X4 630

The Athlon II X4 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,175 points. Launch price was $63.

Intel

Pentium G3450

The Pentium G3450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,182 points. Launch price was $175.

Processing Power

The Athlon II X4 630 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G3450 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X4 630 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X4 630 versus 3.3 GHz on the Pentium G3450 — a 16.4% clock advantage for the Pentium G3450 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Athlon II X4 630 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium G3450 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 630 scores 2,175 against the Pentium G3450's 2,182 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium G3450. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 630 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3450.

FeatureAthlon II X4 630Pentium G3450
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
3.3 GHz+18%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.4 GHz+21%
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Propus (2009−2011)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,175
2,182
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X4 630 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G3450 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon II X4 630Pentium G3450
Socket
AM3
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 630) / not specified (Pentium G3450).

FeatureAthlon II X4 630Pentium G3450
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X4 630 was priced at $129, while the Pentium G3450 came in at $82. On launch pricing ($129 vs $82), Pentium G3450 was $47 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 630 delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 26.6 pts/$ for the Pentium G3450 — making the Pentium G3450 the 44.9% better value option.

FeatureAthlon II X4 630Pentium G3450
MSRP
$129
$82-36%
Performance per Dollar
16.9
26.6+57%
Release Date
2009
2014

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.