CPU
GPU
Athlon II X4 630
Core 2 Quad Q9505
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X4 630 is positioned at rank 868 and the Core 2 Quad Q9505 is on rank 993, so the Athlon II X4 630 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 630
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q9505
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II X4 630 | Core 2 Quad Q9505 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II X4 630 | Core 2 Quad Q9505 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+900%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X4 630 and Core 2 Quad Q9505
Athlon II X4 630
The Athlon II X4 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,175 points. Launch price was $63.
Core 2 Quad Q9505
The Core 2 Quad Q9505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 0.83 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,176 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X4 630 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X4 630 versus 0.83 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9505 — a 108.5% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 630 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.83 GHz). The Athlon II X4 630 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Quad Q9505 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 630 scores 2,175 against the Core 2 Quad Q9505's 2,176 — a 0% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q9505. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 630 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Quad Q9505.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Core 2 Quad Q9505 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz+237% | 0.83 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 2.83 GHz+1% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 6 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 6 MB (total)+1100% |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Yorkfield (2007−2009) |
| PassMark | 2,175 | 2,176 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 630 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Quad Q9505 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon II X4 630) vs 0 (Core 2 Quad Q9505) — the Athlon II X4 630 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Core 2 Quad Q9505 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon II X4 630 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 630) vs VT-x (Core 2 Quad Q9505). Primary use case: Core 2 Quad Q9505 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Core 2 Quad Q9505 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II X4 630 launched at $129 MSRP, while the Core 2 Quad Q9505 debuted at $213. At current prices ($15 vs $150), the Athlon II X4 630 is $135 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 630 delivers 145.0 pts/$ vs 14.5 pts/$ for the Core 2 Quad Q9505 — making the Athlon II X4 630 the 163.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 630 | Core 2 Quad Q9505 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-39% | $213 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-90% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 145.0+900% | 14.5 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X4 630 and Core 2 Quad Q9505
