Pentium T2330
VS
Athlon 64 FX-55

Pentium T2330 vs Athlon 64 FX-55

VS
AMD

Athlon 64 FX-55

1 Cores1 Thrd104 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2004

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium T2330 is positioned at rank 1220 and the Athlon 64 FX-55 is on rank 1134, so the Athlon 64 FX-55 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium T2330

#1208
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
6623%
#1209
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
6526%
#1210
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5991%
#1211
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5964%
#1212
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5909%
#1214
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5707%
#1215
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
5472%
#1216
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
5463%
#1217
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
5316%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
100%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
94%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
92%
#1224
Core i5-560UM
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
92%
#1225
Core i7-660UM
MSRP: $317|Avg: N/A
91%
#1226
C-30
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
91%
#1228
Core i7-620UM
MSRP: $278|Avg: N/A
88%
#1230
Celeron 570
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
85%
#1232
Core i7-820QM
MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A
75%
#1233
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
63%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
53%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-55

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
375560%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
354867%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
257663%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
77623%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
61486%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
53788%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
30807%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
30405%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
27684%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
27682%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
27372%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
26634%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
26261%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
26155%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
25918%
#1134
Athlon 64 FX-55
MSRP: $827|Avg: $50
100%
#1135
Athlon 64 FX-53
MSRP: $799|Avg: $15
98%
#1136
Athlon XP 2000+
MSRP: $339|Avg: $40
89%
#1137
Athlon 64 FX-57
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $200
84%
#1138
Athlon XP 3000+
MSRP: $588|Avg: $20
83%
#1139
Athlon XP 2100+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $30
76%
#1140
Pentium III 1266S
MSRP: $369|Avg: $20
69%
#1141
Pentium 4 1.80
MSRP: $562|Avg: $40
48%
#1142
Pentium III 1133
MSRP: $990|Avg: $30
22%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon 64 FX-55 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium T2330 in both compute-intensive tasks (3.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPentium T2330Athlon 64 FX-55
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($7)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Pentium T2330 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $7 (vs $50), it costs 86% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 588% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Athlon 64 FX-55.
InsightPentium T2330Athlon 64 FX-55
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+588%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($7)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium T2330 and Athlon 64 FX-55

Intel

Pentium T2330

The Pentium T2330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Athlon 64 FX-55

The Athlon 64 FX-55 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 104 Watt. Memory support: DDR1 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 690 points. Launch price was $180.

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 FX-55 is built on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. In PassMark, the Pentium T2330 scores 665 against the Athlon 64 FX-55's 690 — a 3.7% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-55. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T2330 vs 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-55.

FeaturePentium T2330Athlon 64 FX-55
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.6 GHz+63%
L3 Cache
1 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
Process
65 nm-50%
130 nm
Architecture
Clawhammer (2001−2005)
PassMark
665
690+4%
Geekbench 6 Single
223
Geekbench 6 Multi
402
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium T2330 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon 64 FX-55 uses 939 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-533 on the Pentium T2330 versus DDR1-400 on the Athlon 64 FX-55 — the Pentium T2330 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Pentium T2330) vs 0 (Athlon 64 FX-55) — the Pentium T2330 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GL960 (Pentium T2330) and nForce3,nForce4,Xpress 200 (Athlon 64 FX-55).

FeaturePentium T2330Athlon 64 FX-55
Socket
PGA478
939
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-533+100%
DDR1-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Pentium T2330) / not specified (Athlon 64 FX-55).

FeaturePentium T2330Athlon 64 FX-55
Integrated GPU
No
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium T2330 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Athlon 64 FX-55 debuted at $827. At current prices ($7 vs $50), the Pentium T2330 is $43 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium T2330 delivers 95.0 pts/$ vs 13.8 pts/$ for the Athlon 64 FX-55 — making the Pentium T2330 the 149.3% better value option.

FeaturePentium T2330Athlon 64 FX-55
MSRP
$150-82%
$827
Avg Price (30d)
$7-86%
$50
Performance per Dollar
95.0+588%
13.8
Release Date
2007
2004