Pentium T2330
VS
Celeron 857

Pentium T2330 vs Celeron 857

VS
Intel

Celeron 857

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium T2330 is positioned at rank 1220 and the Celeron 857 is on rank 1201, so the Celeron 857 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium T2330

#1208
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
6623%
#1209
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
6526%
#1210
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5991%
#1211
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5964%
#1212
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5909%
#1214
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5707%
#1215
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
5472%
#1216
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
5463%
#1217
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
5316%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
100%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
94%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
92%
#1224
Core i5-560UM
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
92%
#1225
Core i7-660UM
MSRP: $317|Avg: N/A
91%
#1226
C-30
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
91%
#1228
Core i7-620UM
MSRP: $278|Avg: N/A
88%
#1230
Celeron 570
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
85%
#1232
Core i7-820QM
MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A
75%
#1233
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
63%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
53%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 857

#1189
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5578%
#1190
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5496%
#1191
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5046%
#1192
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5023%
#1193
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4977%
#1195
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4806%
#1196
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4608%
#1197
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4601%
#1198
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4477%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
100%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#1203
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
97%
#1204
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
97%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
96%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
96%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
94%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
93%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
93%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
90%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
90%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
89%
#1216
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron 857 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium T2330 in both compute-intensive tasks (5.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPentium T2330Celeron 857
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($7)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Pentium T2330 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $7 (vs $10), it costs 30% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 35% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Celeron 857.
InsightPentium T2330Celeron 857
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+35%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($7)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium T2330 and Celeron 857

Intel

Pentium T2330

The Pentium T2330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron 857

The Celeron 857 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 705 points. Launch price was $134.

Processing Power

The Celeron 857 is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Pentium T2330 scores 665 against the Celeron 857's 705 — a 5.8% lead for the Celeron 857. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T2330 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 857.

FeaturePentium T2330Celeron 857
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.2 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz+33%
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
1 MB L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
665
705+6%
Geekbench 6 Single
223
Geekbench 6 Multi
402
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium T2330 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 857 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-533 on the Pentium T2330 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 857 — the Celeron 857 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 857 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Pentium T2330) vs 16 (Celeron 857) — the Celeron 857 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GL960 (Pentium T2330) and HM65,HM67 (Celeron 857).

FeaturePentium T2330Celeron 857
Socket
PGA478
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-533
DDR3-1333+50%
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
16 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
16+300%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: No (Pentium T2330) vs VT-x (Celeron 857). The Celeron 857 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium T2330 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 857 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 857 rivals Pentium 967.

FeaturePentium T2330Celeron 857
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
No
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium T2330 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Celeron 857 debuted at $134. At current prices ($7 vs $10), the Pentium T2330 is $3 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium T2330 delivers 95.0 pts/$ vs 70.5 pts/$ for the Celeron 857 — making the Pentium T2330 the 29.6% better value option.

FeaturePentium T2330Celeron 857
MSRP
$150
$134-11%
Avg Price (30d)
$7-30%
$10
Performance per Dollar
95.0+35%
70.5
Release Date
2007
2011