Phenom II X3 B77
VS
Pentium M 765

Phenom II X3 B77 vs Pentium M 765

AMD

Phenom II X3 B77

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Pentium M 765

1 Cores1 Thrd21 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2004

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X3 B77 is positioned at rank 1057 and the Pentium M 765 is on rank 918, so the Pentium M 765 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X3 B77

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
47518%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
44899%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
32601%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
9821%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
7779%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
6805%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3898%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3847%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3503%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3502%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3463%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3370%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3323%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3309%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3279%
#1057
Phenom II X3 B77
MSRP: $281|Avg: $35
100%
#1058
Core 2 Duo E6300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
99%
#1059
Core 2 Duo E6400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
98%
#1060
Core 2 Duo E8300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
97%
#1061
Phenom X4 9500
MSRP: $247|Avg: $30
96%
#1062
Celeron D 352
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
92%
#1063
Core i7-970
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $289
92%
#1064
Core i7-880
MSRP: $583|Avg: $40
90%
#1065
Pentium D 820
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
89%
#1066
Celeron 2.10
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
89%
#1067
Core i7-950
MSRP: $562|Avg: $15
88%
#1068
Sempron 3100+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $15
87%
#1069
Athlon II X4 635
MSRP: $400|Avg: $250
86%
#1070
Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP: $183|Avg: $15
86%
#1071
Core i7-940
MSRP: $562|Avg: $90
82%
#1072
Celeron 2.40
MSRP: $69|Avg: $13
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 765

#906
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1600%
#907
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1576%
#908
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1447%
#909
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1441%
#910
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1427%
#912
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1378%
#913
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1322%
#914
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1320%
#915
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1284%
#918
Pentium M 765
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#919
Core i5-8365UE
MSRP: $297|Avg: $297
100%
#921
A6 Pro-7050B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
99%
#923
Athlon II N370
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#928
A8-6410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
97%
#933
Athlon X2 L310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Phenom II X3 B77 (2010) utilizes 45 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPhenom II X3 B77Pentium M 765
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Heka (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium M 765 (2004) relies on 90 nm technology and DDR2, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPhenom II X3 B77Pentium M 765
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X3 B77 and Pentium M 765

AMD

Phenom II X3 B77

The Phenom II X3 B77 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Heka (2009−2010) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,844 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Pentium M 765

The Pentium M 765 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,834 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Phenom II X3 B77 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Pentium M 765 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Phenom II X3 B77 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Phenom II X3 B77 versus 2.1 GHz on the Pentium M 765 — a 41.5% clock advantage for the Phenom II X3 B77 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Phenom II X3 B77 uses the Heka (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium M 765 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X3 B77 scores 1,844 against the Pentium M 765's 1,834 — a 0.5% lead for the Phenom II X3 B77. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X3 B77 vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 765.

FeaturePhenom II X3 B77Pentium M 765
Cores / Threads
3 / 3+200%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+52%
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+52%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
2 MB+300%
Process
45 nm-50%
90 nm
Architecture
Heka (2009−2010)
Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark
1,844
1,834
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X3 B77 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 765 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Phenom II X3 B77 versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 765 — the Phenom II X3 B77 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Phenom II X3 B77 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Phenom II X3 B77) vs 16 (Pentium M 765) — the Pentium M 765 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM3 (Phenom II X3 B77) and 915GM,945GT (Pentium M 765).

FeaturePhenom II X3 B77Pentium M 765
Socket
AM3
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333+50%
DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+700%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Phenom II X3 B77) / false (Pentium M 765).

FeaturePhenom II X3 B77Pentium M 765
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false