Phenom II X4 830
VS
Celeron 2957U

Phenom II X4 830 vs Celeron 2957U

AMD

Phenom II X4 830

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Celeron 2957U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X4 830 is positioned at rank 307 and the Celeron 2957U is on rank 53, so the Celeron 2957U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 830

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4513%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4264%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3096%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
933%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
739%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
646%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
370%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
365%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
333%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
333%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
329%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
320%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
316%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
314%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
311%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
100%
#284
Core i7-14701E
MSRP: $392|Avg: $380
100%
#285
Core i5-10400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $175
99%
#286
Core i3-12100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $180
99%
#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
97%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
97%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
96%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
96%
#307
Phenom II X4 830
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#312
Phenom II X4 810
MSRP: $175|Avg: N/A
98%
#314
Athlon 5150
MSRP: $21|Avg: $21
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2957U

#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
96%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#41
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
212%
#42
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
209%
#43
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
192%
#44
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
191%
#45
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
189%
#47
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
183%
#48
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
175%
#49
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
175%
#50
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
170%
#53
Celeron 2957U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#65
Core i5-3320M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#66
Core i7-4510U
MSRP: $393|Avg: N/A
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Phenom II X4 830 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 2957U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPhenom II X4 830Celeron 2957U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Deneb (2009−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPhenom II X4 830Celeron 2957U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X4 830 and Celeron 2957U

AMD

Phenom II X4 830

The Phenom II X4 830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,072 points. Launch price was $80.

Intel

Celeron 2957U

The Celeron 2957U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,077 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

The Phenom II X4 830 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron 2957U offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Phenom II X4 830 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X4 830 versus 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 2957U — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 830 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Phenom II X4 830 uses the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 2957U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X4 830 scores 2,072 against the Celeron 2957U's 2,077 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron 2957U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 830 vs 2 MB on the Celeron 2957U.

FeaturePhenom II X4 830Celeron 2957U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+100%
1.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+100%
1.4 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+100%
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512 kB
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Deneb (2009−2011)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,072
2,077
Geekbench 6 Single
284
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X4 830 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 2957U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom II X4 830Celeron 2957U
Socket
AM3
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Phenom II X4 830) / VT-x (Celeron 2957U). The Celeron 2957U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Phenom II X4 830 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2957U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2957U rivals Pentium 2117U.

FeaturePhenom II X4 830Celeron 2957U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget