Phenom II X4 830
VS
Pentium G3258

Phenom II X4 830 vs Pentium G3258

AMD

Phenom II X4 830

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Pentium G3258

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X4 830 is positioned at rank 307 and the Pentium G3258 is on rank 632, so the Phenom II X4 830 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 830

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4513%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4264%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3096%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
933%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
739%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
646%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
370%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
365%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
333%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
333%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
329%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
320%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
316%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
314%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
311%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
100%
#284
Core i7-14701E
MSRP: $392|Avg: $380
100%
#285
Core i5-10400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $175
99%
#286
Core i3-12100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $180
99%
#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
97%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
97%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
96%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
96%
#307
Phenom II X4 830
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#312
Phenom II X4 810
MSRP: $175|Avg: N/A
98%
#314
Athlon 5150
MSRP: $21|Avg: $21
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G3258

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11331%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10707%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7774%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2342%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1855%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1623%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
929%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
917%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
835%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
835%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
826%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
804%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
792%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
789%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
782%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
100%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#632
Pentium G3258
MSRP: $75|Avg: $72
100%
#633
Celeron G555
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
100%
#634
Celeron G530
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
99%
#635
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
99%
#636
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
#637
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#638
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
98%
#639
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#640
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
98%
#641
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
98%
#644
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
97%
#645
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
97%
#646
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium G3258 leads in gaming performance. However, the Phenom II X4 830 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPhenom II X4 830Pentium G3258
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($72)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Deneb (2009−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPhenom II X4 830Pentium G3258
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($72)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X4 830 and Pentium G3258

AMD

Phenom II X4 830

The Phenom II X4 830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,072 points. Launch price was $80.

Intel

Pentium G3258

The Pentium G3258 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,063 points. Launch price was $77.

Processing Power

The Phenom II X4 830 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G3258 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Phenom II X4 830 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X4 830 versus 3.2 GHz on the Pentium G3258 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Pentium G3258 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Phenom II X4 830 uses the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium G3258 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X4 830 scores 2,072 against the Pentium G3258's 2,063 — a 0.4% lead for the Phenom II X4 830. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 830 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3258.

FeaturePhenom II X4 830Pentium G3258
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
3.2 GHz+14%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.2 GHz+14%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+33%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Deneb (2009−2011)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,072
2,063
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X4 830 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G3258 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom II X4 830Pentium G3258
Socket
AM3
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Phenom II X4 830) / VT-x (Pentium G3258). The Pentium G3258 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics), while the Phenom II X4 830 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G3258 targets Desktop.

FeaturePhenom II X4 830Pentium G3258
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop