Phenom II X4 840
VS
Core i3-3250

Phenom II X4 840 vs Core i3-3250

AMD

Phenom II X4 840

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i3-3250

2 Cores4 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X4 840 is positioned at rank 250 and the Core i3-3250 is on rank 846, so the Phenom II X4 840 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 840

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
3819%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
3608%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
2620%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
789%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
625%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
547%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
313%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
309%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
281%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
281%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
278%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
271%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
267%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
266%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
264%
#239
Core i5-9600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $118
100%
#240
Core i5-12400T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
99%
#241
Core i9-14900F
MSRP: $524|Avg: $579
99%
#242
Celeron G6900E
MSRP: $53|Avg: $53
99%
#243
Core i3-12300T
MSRP: $209|Avg: $164
98%
#244
Core i9-12900
MSRP: $519|Avg: $420
98%
#245
Ryzen 3 8300G
MSRP: $176|Avg: $176
98%
#246
Core i7-11700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $299
98%
#247
Core i5-10600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $179
98%
#248
Core i3-10325
MSRP: $154|Avg: $130
97%
#249
Ryzen Embedded V2718
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
97%
#250
Phenom II X4 840
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#250
Core i7-8086K
MSRP: $425|Avg: $178
97%
#251
Phenom II X4 850
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $28
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3250

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17483%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16519%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11994%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3613%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2862%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2504%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1434%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1415%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1289%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1289%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1274%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1240%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1222%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1218%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1207%
#846
Core i3-3250
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
100%
#847
Core i3-3240
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
100%
#848
Pentium G640T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
100%
#849
Core i7-5930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $410
100%
#851
Core i3-3240T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $8
100%
#852
Athlon II X2 240
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#854
Core i5-2500S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
99%
#855
Athlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
98%
#857
Pentium G850
MSRP: $86|Avg: $75
97%
#858
Core i3-2102
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
97%
#859
Core i5-3475S
MSRP: $249|Avg: $42
97%
#860
Core i7-2600K
MSRP: $317|Avg: $109
97%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-3250 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Phenom II X4 840 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPhenom II X4 840Core i3-3250
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPhenom II X4 840Core i3-3250
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X4 840 and Core i3-3250

AMD

Phenom II X4 840

The Phenom II X4 840 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,449 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Core i3-3250

The Core i3-3250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,460 points. Launch price was $138.

Processing Power

The Phenom II X4 840 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-3250 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 840 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Phenom II X4 840 versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-3250 — a 9% clock advantage for the Core i3-3250 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Phenom II X4 840 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-3250 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X4 840 scores 2,449 against the Core i3-3250's 2,460 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-3250. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Phenom II X4 840 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3250.

FeaturePhenom II X4 840Core i3-3250
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz+9%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Propus (2009−2011)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,449
2,460
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X4 840 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-3250 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom II X4 840Core i3-3250
Socket
AM3
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%