Phenom II X4 840 vs Xeon D-1602

Phenom II X4 840 vs Xeon D-1602 Performance Spectrum

Phenom II X4 840

4 / 4

2,449

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon D-1602

2 / 4

2,459

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Phenom II X4 840 vs Xeon D-1602 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Phenom II X4 840 vs Xeon D-1602: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Phenom II X4 840

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,449 vs 2,459).
❌251.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 27W.

Xeon D-1602

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 27W instead of 95W, a 68W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X4 840 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1602 better than Phenom II X4 840?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1602 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Phenom II X4 840 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1602 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1602 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon D-1602 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1602 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Phenom II X4 840 vs Xeon D-1602 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Phenom II X4 840

The Phenom II X4 840 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,449 points. Launch price was $90.

Xeon D-1602

The Xeon D-1602 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,459 points. Launch price was $106.

⚡

Processing Power

The Phenom II X4 840 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon D-1602 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 840 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Phenom II X4 840 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon D-1602 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Phenom II X4 840 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon D-1602 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X4 840 scores 2,449 against the Xeon D-1602's 2,459 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon D-1602. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Phenom II X4 840 vs 3 MB on the Xeon D-1602.

Feature	Phenom II X4 840	Xeon D-1602
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+28%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB
Process	45 nm	14 nm-69%
Architecture	Propus (2009−2011)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	2,449	2,459

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X4 840 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon D-1602 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.