Core i7-4610Y vs Phenom II X4 840

Core i7-4610Y vs Phenom II X4 840 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4610Y

2 / 4

2,446

0.0%

2,449

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4610Y vs Phenom II X4 840 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4610Y vs Phenom II X4 840: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4610Y

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4200, while Phenom II X4 840 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X4 840 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,446 vs 2,449).
❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.

Phenom II X4 840

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4610Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom II X4 840 better than Core i7-4610Y?

Yes. Phenom II X4 840 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Phenom II X4 840 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 840 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom II X4 840 still makes the most sense overall. Phenom II X4 840 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4610Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4610Y vs Phenom II X4 840 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4610Y

The Core i7-4610Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,446 points. Launch price was $415.

Phenom II X4 840

The Phenom II X4 840 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,449 points. Launch price was $90.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4610Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X4 840 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 840 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-4610Y versus 3.2 GHz on the Phenom II X4 840 — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 840 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-4610Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom II X4 840 uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4610Y scores 2,446 against the Phenom II X4 840's 2,449 — a 0.1% lead for the Phenom II X4 840. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-4610Y vs 0 kB on the Phenom II X4 840.

Feature	Core i7-4610Y	Phenom II X4 840
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.2 GHz+10%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	3.2 GHz+88%
L3 Cache	4 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Propus (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,446	2,449
Geekbench 6 Single	700	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,350	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4610Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X4 840 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4610Y	Phenom II X4 840
Socket	FCBGA1168	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4610Y) / not specified (Phenom II X4 840). The Core i7-4610Y includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4200), while the Phenom II X4 840 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4610Y targets Ultrabook/Tablet.