Core i7-2640M
VS
Core i7-4610Y

Core i7-2640M vs Core i7-4610Y

Intel

Core i7-2640M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i7-4610Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2640M is positioned at rank 1159 and the Core i7-4610Y is on rank 458, so the Core i7-4610Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2640M

#1147
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4150%
#1148
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4089%
#1149
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3754%
#1150
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3737%
#1151
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3703%
#1153
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3576%
#1154
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3429%
#1155
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3423%
#1156
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3331%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
100%
#1161
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
99%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
97%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
96%
#1166
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1167
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
96%
#1168
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
95%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
95%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
94%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4610Y

#144
Core i7-12650H
MSRP: $457|Avg: N/A
97%
#446
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
600%
#447
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
591%
#448
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
543%
#449
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
540%
#450
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
535%
#452
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
517%
#453
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
496%
#454
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
495%
#455
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
481%
#458
Core i7-4610Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#472
Ryzen Embedded R1505G
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-4610Y delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-2640M in both compute-intensive tasks (0% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-2640MCore i7-4610Y
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($346)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-2640MCore i7-4610Y
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($346)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2640M and Core i7-4610Y

Intel

Core i7-2640M

The Core i7-2640M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,445 points. Launch price was $346.

Intel

Core i7-4610Y

The Core i7-4610Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,446 points. Launch price was $415.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-2640M and Core i7-4610Y share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-2640M versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-4610Y — a 18.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-2640M (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i7-2640M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-4610Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2640M scores 2,445 against the Core i7-4610Y's 2,446 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-4610Y. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 563 vs 700, a 21.7% lead for the Core i7-4610Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,184 vs 1,350 (13.1% advantage for the Core i7-4610Y). Both processors carry 4 MB of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-2640MCore i7-4610Y
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+21%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+65%
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,445
2,446
Geekbench 6 Single
563
700+24%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,184
1,350+14%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2640M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-4610Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core i7-2640M versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-4610Y — the Core i7-2640M supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-2640M) vs 12 (Core i7-4610Y) — the Core i7-2640M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2640M) and Haswell Y (Core i7-4610Y).

FeatureCore i7-2640MCore i7-4610Y
Socket
PGA988
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
1333+44333%
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16
16 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-2640M) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4610Y). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2640M) and Intel HD Graphics 4200 (Core i7-4610Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4610Y targets Ultrabook/Tablet. Direct competitor: Core i7-2640M rivals Phenom II Black Edition N660.

FeatureCore i7-2640MCore i7-4610Y
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Intel HD Graphics 4200
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Ultrabook/Tablet