Core i7-2640M
VS
Phenom II X4 850

Core i7-2640M vs Phenom II X4 850

Intel

Core i7-2640M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Phenom II X4 850

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2640M is positioned at rank 1159 and the Phenom II X4 850 is on rank 251, so the Phenom II X4 850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2640M

#1147
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4150%
#1148
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4089%
#1149
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3754%
#1150
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3737%
#1151
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3703%
#1153
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3576%
#1154
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3429%
#1155
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3423%
#1156
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3331%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
100%
#1161
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
99%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
97%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
96%
#1166
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1167
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
96%
#1168
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
95%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
95%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
94%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 850

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
3831%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
3620%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
2628%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
792%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
627%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
549%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
314%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
310%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
282%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
282%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
279%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
272%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
268%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
267%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
264%
#239
Core i5-9600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $118
100%
#240
Core i5-12400T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
99%
#241
Core i9-14900F
MSRP: $524|Avg: $579
99%
#242
Celeron G6900E
MSRP: $53|Avg: $53
99%
#243
Core i3-12300T
MSRP: $209|Avg: $164
99%
#244
Core i9-12900
MSRP: $519|Avg: $420
99%
#245
Ryzen 3 8300G
MSRP: $176|Avg: $176
99%
#246
Core i7-11700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $299
98%
#247
Core i5-10600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $179
98%
#248
Core i3-10325
MSRP: $154|Avg: $130
97%
#249
Ryzen Embedded V2718
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
97%
#250
Core i7-8086K
MSRP: $425|Avg: $178
97%
#251
Phenom II X4 850
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $28
100%
#251
Core i3-10300T
MSRP: $157|Avg: $100
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-2640M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Phenom II X4 850 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-2640MPhenom II X4 850
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($346)
More affordable ($28)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Phenom II X4 850 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $28 (vs $346), it costs 92% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 1134% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Core i7-2640M.
InsightCore i7-2640MPhenom II X4 850
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1134%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($346)
More affordable ($28)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2640M and Phenom II X4 850

Intel

Core i7-2640M

The Core i7-2640M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,445 points. Launch price was $346.

AMD

Phenom II X4 850

The Phenom II X4 850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,441 points. Launch price was $111.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2640M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X4 850 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-2640M versus 3.3 GHz on the Phenom II X4 850 — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-2640M (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-2640M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Phenom II X4 850 uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2640M scores 2,445 against the Phenom II X4 850's 2,441 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-2640M. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-2640M vs 0 kB on the Phenom II X4 850.

FeatureCore i7-2640MPhenom II X4 850
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+6%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.3 GHz+18%
L3 Cache
4 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Propus (2009−2011)
PassMark
2,445
2,441
Geekbench 6 Single
563
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,184
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2640M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X4 850 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-2640MPhenom II X4 850
Socket
PGA988
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1333
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-2640M) / not specified (Phenom II X4 850). The Core i7-2640M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Phenom II X4 850 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2640M rivals Phenom II Black Edition N660.

FeatureCore i7-2640MPhenom II X4 850
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true