A4-5150M vs Core i7-2640M

A4-5150M vs Core i7-2640M Performance Spectrum

A4-5150M

2 / 2

2,446

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-2640M

2 / 4

2,445

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-5150M vs Core i7-2640M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-5150M vs Core i7-2640M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-5150M

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-2640M

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A4-5150M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,445 vs 2,446).
❌Launch MSRP is still $346 MSRP, while A4-5150M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-5150M better than Core i7-2640M?

Yes. A4-5150M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4-5150M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-5150M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-5150M is still the much better call for a fresh build. A4-5150M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $346 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-2640M only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (7.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-5150M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-5150M vs Core i7-2640M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-5150M

The A4-5150M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,446 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i7-2640M

The Core i7-2640M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,445 points. Launch price was $346.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-5150M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-2640M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A4-5150M versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-2640M — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-2640M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A4-5150M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-2640M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-5150M scores 2,446 against the Core i7-2640M's 2,445 — a 0% lead for the A4-5150M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 300 vs 563, a 61% lead for the Core i7-2640M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-5150M vs 4 MB on the Core i7-2640M.

Feature	A4-5150M	Core i7-2640M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.5 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	2.8 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	2,446	2,445
Geekbench 6 Single	300	563+88%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,184

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-5150M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2640M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4-5150M versus 1333 on the Core i7-2640M — the A4-5150M supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A4-5150M	Core i7-2640M
Socket	FS1r2	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-5150M) vs true (Core i7-2640M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8350G (A4-5150M) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2640M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5150M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-5150M rivals Pentium 2020M; Core i7-2640M rivals Phenom II Black Edition N660.