A4-5150M vs Xeon E5606

A4-5150M vs Xeon E5606 Performance Spectrum

A4-5150M

2 / 2

2,446

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5606

4 / 4

2,443

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-5150M vs Xeon E5606 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-5150M vs Xeon E5606: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-5150M

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8350G, while Xeon E5606 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5606, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon E5606

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A4-5150M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,443 vs 2,446).
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-5150M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-5150M better than Xeon E5606?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5606 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A4-5150M is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4-5150M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-5150M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-5150M still makes the most sense overall. A4-5150M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-5150M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-5150M vs Xeon E5606 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-5150M

The A4-5150M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,446 points. Launch price was $50.

Xeon E5606

The Xeon E5606 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,443 points. Launch price was $46.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-5150M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5606 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5606 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A4-5150M versus 0.13 GHz on the Xeon E5606 — a 184.8% clock advantage for the A4-5150M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The A4-5150M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5606 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-5150M scores 2,446 against the Xeon E5606's 2,443 — a 0.1% lead for the A4-5150M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-5150M vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E5606.

Feature	A4-5150M	Xeon E5606
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+2438%	0.13 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+27%	2.13 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,446	2,443
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-5150M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5606 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-5150M	Xeon E5606
Socket	FS1r2	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-5150M) / not specified (Xeon E5606). The A4-5150M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8350G), while the Xeon E5606 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5150M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-5150M rivals Pentium 2020M.