A4-5150M vs Core i3-3250

A4-5150M vs Core i3-3250 Performance Spectrum

A4-5150M

2 / 2

2,446

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-3250

2 / 4

2,460

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-5150M vs Core i3-3250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-5150M vs Core i3-3250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-5150M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 55W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8350G, while Core i3-3250 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,446 vs 2,460).

Core i3-3250

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while A4-5150M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌57.1% higher power demand at 55W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-5150M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-3250 better than A4-5150M?

Yes. Core i3-3250 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-3250 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3250 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-3250 is the better buy right now. Core i3-3250 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $138 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (17.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-3250 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-5150M vs Core i3-3250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-5150M

The A4-5150M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,446 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i3-3250

The Core i3-3250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,460 points. Launch price was $138.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-5150M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-3250's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A4-5150M versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-3250 — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Core i3-3250 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The A4-5150M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-3250 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A4-5150M scores 2,446 against the Core i3-3250's 2,460 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-3250. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-5150M vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3250.

Feature	A4-5150M	Core i3-3250
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.5 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3.5 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,446	2,460
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-5150M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3250 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-5150M	Core i3-3250
Socket	FS1r2	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-5150M) / not specified (Core i3-3250). The A4-5150M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8350G), while the Core i3-3250 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5150M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-5150M rivals Pentium 2020M.