A4-5150M vs Core i7-3667U

A4-5150M vs Core i7-3667U Performance Spectrum

A4-5150M

2 / 2

2,446

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-3667U

2 / 4

2,451

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-5150M vs Core i7-3667U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-5150M vs Core i7-3667U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-5150M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,446 vs 2,451).

Core i7-3667U

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-5150M better than Core i7-3667U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4-5150M is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3667U pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3667U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-5150M still makes the most sense overall. A4-5150M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-5150M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-5150M vs Core i7-3667U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-5150M

The A4-5150M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,446 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i7-3667U

The Core i7-3667U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,451 points. Launch price was $346.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-5150M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-3667U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A4-5150M versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-3667U — a 3.1% clock advantage for the A4-5150M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A4-5150M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-3667U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A4-5150M scores 2,446 against the Core i7-3667U's 2,451 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-3667U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-5150M vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3667U.

Feature	A4-5150M	Core i7-3667U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+3%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+35%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,446	2,451
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-5150M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3667U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Core i7-3667U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A4-5150M	Core i7-3667U
Socket	FS1r2	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-5150M) vs true (Core i7-3667U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8350G (A4-5150M) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3667U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5150M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-5150M rivals Pentium 2020M; Core i7-3667U rivals AMD A10-4655M.