A4-5150M vs Xeon D-1602

A4-5150M vs Xeon D-1602 Performance Spectrum

A4-5150M

2 / 2

2,446

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon D-1602

2 / 4

2,459

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-5150M vs Xeon D-1602 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-5150M vs Xeon D-1602: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-5150M

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8350G, while Xeon D-1602 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,446 vs 2,459).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1602, which brings 2 cores / 4 threads.
❌29.6% higher power demand at 35W vs 27W.

Xeon D-1602

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 2 cores / 4 threads.
✅Draws 27W instead of 35W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A4-5150M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-5150M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1602 better than A4-5150M?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1602 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A4-5150M is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1602 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1602 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon D-1602 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1602 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-5150M vs Xeon D-1602 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-5150M

The A4-5150M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,446 points. Launch price was $50.

Xeon D-1602

The Xeon D-1602 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,459 points. Launch price was $106.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-5150M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Xeon D-1602's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A4-5150M versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon D-1602 — a 3.1% clock advantage for the A4-5150M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A4-5150M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon D-1602 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A4-5150M scores 2,446 against the Xeon D-1602's 2,459 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon D-1602. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-5150M vs 3 MB on the Xeon D-1602.

Feature	A4-5150M	Xeon D-1602
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+3%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+8%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	2,446	2,459
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-5150M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1602 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-5150M	Xeon D-1602
Socket	FS1r2	FCBGA1667
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-5150M) / not specified (Xeon D-1602). The A4-5150M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8350G), while the Xeon D-1602 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5150M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-5150M rivals Pentium 2020M.