A4-5150M vs Celeron N4120

A4-5150M vs Celeron N4120 Performance Spectrum

A4-5150M

2 / 2

2,446

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N4120

4 / 4

2,463

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-5150M vs Celeron N4120 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-5150M vs Celeron N4120: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-5150M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8350G, while Celeron N4120 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,446 vs 2,463).
❌775% higher power demand at 35W vs 4W.

Celeron N4120

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 4W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while A4-5150M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N4120 better than A4-5150M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4-5150M is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4120 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4120 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N4120 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N4120 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4120 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-5150M vs Celeron N4120 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-5150M

The A4-5150M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,446 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron N4120

The Celeron N4120 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,463 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-5150M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron N4120 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N4120 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A4-5150M versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4120 — a 23.7% clock advantage for the A4-5150M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A4-5150M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N4120 uses Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A4-5150M scores 2,446 against the Celeron N4120's 2,463 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron N4120. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-5150M vs 4 MB on the Celeron N4120.

Feature	A4-5150M	Celeron N4120
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+27%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+145%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+12700%	4 MB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
PassMark	2,446	2,463
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-5150M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N4120 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-5150M	Celeron N4120
Socket	FS1r2	FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-5150M) / not specified (Celeron N4120). The A4-5150M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8350G), while the Celeron N4120 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5150M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-5150M rivals Pentium 2020M.