A4-5150M vs Core i5-660

A4-5150M vs Core i5-660 Performance Spectrum

A4-5150M

2 / 2

2,446

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-660

2 / 4

2,439

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-5150M vs Core i5-660 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-5150M vs Core i5-660: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-5150M

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 73W, a 38W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8350G, while Core i5-660 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i5-660

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,439 vs 2,446).
❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while A4-5150M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌108.6% higher power demand at 73W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-5150M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-5150M better than Core i5-660?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-660 is ahead with a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A4-5150M pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-5150M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-5150M is still the much better call for a fresh build. A4-5150M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. Core i5-660 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (12.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1156.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-5150M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-5150M vs Core i5-660 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-5150M

The A4-5150M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,446 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i5-660

The Core i5-660 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,439 points. Launch price was $70.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-5150M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-660's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A4-5150M versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-660 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-660 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The A4-5150M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-660 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-5150M scores 2,446 against the Core i5-660's 2,439 — a 0.3% lead for the A4-5150M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-5150M vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-660.

Feature	A4-5150M	Core i5-660
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.6 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3.33 GHz+23%
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,446	2,439
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-5150M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-660 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-5150M	Core i5-660
Socket	FS1r2	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-5150M) / not specified (Core i5-660). The A4-5150M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8350G), while the Core i5-660 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5150M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-5150M rivals Pentium 2020M.