Core i7-3667U vs Core i7-4610Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3667U vs Core i7-4610Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3667U vs Core i7-4610Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3667U

2012

Why buy it

✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-4610Y

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,446 vs 2,451).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-3667U better than Core i7-4610Y?

Yes. Core i7-3667U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-3667U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3667U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-3667U still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-3667U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4610Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-3667U vs Core i7-4610Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3667U

The Core i7-3667U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,451 points. Launch price was $346.

Core i7-4610Y

The Core i7-4610Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,446 points. Launch price was $415.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-3667U and Core i7-4610Y share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-3667U versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-4610Y — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-3667U (base: 2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i7-3667U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-4610Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3667U scores 2,451 against the Core i7-4610Y's 2,446 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-3667U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3667U vs 4 MB on the Core i7-4610Y.

Feature	Core i7-3667U	Core i7-4610Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+10%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz+18%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,451	2,446
Geekbench 6 Single	—	700
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,350

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3667U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4610Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 1600 memory speed. The Core i7-3667U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-3667U) vs 12 (Core i7-4610Y) — the Core i7-3667U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM76,UM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i7-3667U) and Haswell Y (Core i7-4610Y).

Feature	Core i7-3667U	Core i7-4610Y
Socket	BGA1023	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-3667U) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4610Y). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3667U) and Intel HD Graphics 4200 (Core i7-4610Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4610Y targets Ultrabook/Tablet. Direct competitor: Core i7-3667U rivals AMD A10-4655M.

Feature	Core i7-3667U	Core i7-4610Y
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 4000	Intel HD Graphics 4200
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Ultrabook/Tablet