Core i7-3667U vs Core i7-4650U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3667U vs Core i7-4650U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3667U vs Core i7-4650U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3667U

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Core i7-4650U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,451 vs 2,463).

Core i7-4650U

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-3667U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4650U better than Core i7-3667U?

Yes. Core i7-4650U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4650U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4650U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4650U still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-4650U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4650U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-3667U vs Core i7-4650U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3667U

The Core i7-3667U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,451 points. Launch price was $346.

Core i7-4650U

The Core i7-4650U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-ULT (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,463 points. Launch price was $454.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-3667U and Core i7-4650U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-3667U versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-4650U — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-4650U (base: 2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i7-3667U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-4650U uses Haswell-ULT (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3667U scores 2,451 against the Core i7-4650U's 2,463 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-4650U. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-3667U	Core i7-4650U
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.3 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2 GHz+18%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Haswell-ULT (2013)
PassMark	2,451	2,463

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3667U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4650U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-3667U	Core i7-4650U
Socket	BGA1023	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-3667U) / not specified (Core i7-4650U). The Core i7-3667U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Core i7-4650U requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-3667U rivals AMD A10-4655M.