Core i7-3667U
VS
Phenom II X4 840

Core i7-3667U vs Phenom II X4 840

Intel

Core i7-3667U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2012
VS
AMD

Phenom II X4 840

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3667U is positioned at rank 1197 and the Phenom II X4 840 is on rank 250, so the Phenom II X4 840 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3667U

#1184
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5383%
#1185
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5305%
#1186
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4870%
#1187
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4848%
#1188
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4803%
#1190
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4639%
#1191
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4448%
#1192
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4440%
#1193
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4321%
#1197
Core i7-3667U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1198
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
98%
#1199
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1200
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1201
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#1202
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
94%
#1203
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
94%
#1204
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
93%
#1205
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
93%
#1206
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
91%
#1207
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
90%
#1208
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
89%
#1210
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
87%
#1211
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 840

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
3819%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
3608%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
2620%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
789%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
625%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
547%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
313%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
309%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
281%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
281%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
278%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
271%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
267%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
266%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
264%
#239
Core i5-9600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $118
100%
#240
Core i5-12400T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
99%
#241
Core i9-14900F
MSRP: $524|Avg: $579
99%
#242
Celeron G6900E
MSRP: $53|Avg: $53
99%
#243
Core i3-12300T
MSRP: $209|Avg: $164
98%
#244
Core i9-12900
MSRP: $519|Avg: $420
98%
#245
Ryzen 3 8300G
MSRP: $176|Avg: $176
98%
#246
Core i7-11700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $299
98%
#247
Core i5-10600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $179
98%
#248
Core i3-10325
MSRP: $154|Avg: $130
97%
#249
Ryzen Embedded V2718
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
97%
#250
Phenom II X4 840
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#250
Core i7-8086K
MSRP: $425|Avg: $178
97%
#251
Phenom II X4 850
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $28
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Core i7-3667U shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.
InsightCore i7-3667UPhenom II X4 840
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-3667UPhenom II X4 840
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3667U and Phenom II X4 840

Intel

Core i7-3667U

The Core i7-3667U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,451 points. Launch price was $346.

AMD

Phenom II X4 840

The Phenom II X4 840 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,449 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Core i7-3667U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X4 840 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 840 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-3667U versus 3.2 GHz on the Phenom II X4 840 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-3667U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom II X4 840 uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3667U scores 2,451 against the Phenom II X4 840's 2,449 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-3667U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3667U vs 0 kB on the Phenom II X4 840.

FeatureCore i7-3667UPhenom II X4 840
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.2 GHz+60%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Propus (2009−2011)
PassMark
2,451
2,449
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3667U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X4 840 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-3667UPhenom II X4 840
Socket
BGA1023
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
32
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-3667U) / not specified (Phenom II X4 840). The Core i7-3667U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Phenom II X4 840 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-3667U rivals AMD A10-4655M.

FeatureCore i7-3667UPhenom II X4 840
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true