Phenom II X4 900e
Xeon 5160
Phenom II X4 900e vs Xeon 5160 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Phenom II X4 900e vs Xeon 5160 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Phenom II X4 900e vs Xeon 5160: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Phenom II X4 900e
2009Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 5160 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Xeon 5160
2006Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,715 vs 1,727).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Phenom II X4 900e better than Xeon 5160?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Phenom II X4 900e vs Xeon 5160 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Phenom II X4 900e
The Phenom II X4 900e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,727 points. Launch price was $149.
Xeon 5160
The Xeon 5160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,715 points. Launch price was $22.
Processing Power
The Phenom II X4 900e packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon 5160 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Phenom II X4 900e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Phenom II X4 900e versus 3 GHz on the Xeon 5160 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Xeon 5160 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Phenom II X4 900e uses the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon 5160 uses Woodcrest (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X4 900e scores 1,727 against the Xeon 5160's 1,715 — a 0.7% lead for the Phenom II X4 900e. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 900e vs 0 kB on the Xeon 5160.
| Feature | Phenom II X4 900e | Xeon 5160 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz+25% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 4 MB+700% |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Deneb (2009−2011) | Woodcrest (2006) |
| PassMark | 1,727 | 1,715 |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom II X4 900e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon 5160 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Phenom II X4 900e | Xeon 5160 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Phenom II X4 900e and Xeon 5160
