Phenom II X4 900e
VS
Xeon L5335

Phenom II X4 900e vs Xeon L5335

AMD

Phenom II X4 900e

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Xeon L5335

4 Cores4 Thrd50 WWMax: 2 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X4 900e is positioned at rank 373 and the Xeon L5335 is on rank 995, so the Phenom II X4 900e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 900e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5415%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5116%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3715%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1119%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
886%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
775%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
444%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
438%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
399%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
399%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
395%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
384%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
379%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
377%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
374%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
100%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
98%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
98%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
97%
#327
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $452
97%
#328
Core i9-9900KS
MSRP: $513|Avg: $350
96%
#329
Core i5-11600T
MSRP: $262|Avg: $262
96%
#330
Core i9-9900K
MSRP: $488|Avg: $331
95%
#373
Phenom II X4 900e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#378
Ryzen 5 1600
MSRP: $219|Avg: $144
97%
#385
Pentium G4560
MSRP: $64|Avg: $85
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon L5335

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
45475%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
8586%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
7628%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
5893%
#537
Xeon Platinum 8180
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $2363
84%
#538
Xeon Platinum 8280M
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $6223
82%
#539
Xeon Platinum 8280
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $2940
81%
#994
Xeon E5-4627 v2
MSRP: $2061|Avg: $70
100%
#995
Xeon L5335
MSRP: $380|Avg: $18
100%
#996
Xeon E-2144G
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $389
98%
#997
Xeon X5675
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $22
98%
#998
Xeon Phi 7210
MSRP: $1881|Avg: $150
85%
#999
Xeon D-1567
MSRP: $2702|Avg: $230
85%
#1000
Xeon E-2126G
MSRP: $2702|Avg: $230
84%
#1003
Xeon D-1531
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $250
82%
#1004
Xeon 5130
MSRP: $316|Avg: $10
81%
#1006
Xeon E5-4640 v3
MSRP: $2859|Avg: $300
79%
#1007
Xeon E5440
MSRP: $690|Avg: $37
75%
#1008
Xeon E5-2643
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $50
74%
#1009
Xeon E5-2637
MSRP: $885|Avg: $40
74%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($18) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon L5335 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightPhenom II X4 900eXeon L5335
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($18)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Deneb (2009−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clovertown (2006−2007) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Phenom II X4 900e ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($18 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightPhenom II X4 900eXeon L5335
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($18)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X4 900e and Xeon L5335

AMD

Phenom II X4 900e

The Phenom II X4 900e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,727 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon L5335

The Xeon L5335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 August 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,737 points. Launch price was $380.

Processing Power

Both the Phenom II X4 900e and Xeon L5335 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Phenom II X4 900e versus 2 GHz on the Xeon L5335 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 900e (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Phenom II X4 900e uses the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon L5335 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X4 900e scores 1,727 against the Xeon L5335's 1,737 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon L5335. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 900e vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L5335.

FeaturePhenom II X4 900eXeon L5335
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+20%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+20%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8 MB L2 Cache+33%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
4 MB (total)+700%
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Deneb (2009−2011)
Clovertown (2006−2007)
PassMark
1,727
1,737
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X4 900e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon L5335 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom II X4 900eXeon L5335
Socket
AM3
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0