Phenom II X4 900e vs Xeon L5335

Phenom II X4 900e vs Xeon L5335 Performance Spectrum

Phenom II X4 900e

4 / 4

1,727

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon L5335

4 / 4

1,737

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Phenom II X4 900e vs Xeon L5335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Phenom II X4 900e vs Xeon L5335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Phenom II X4 900e

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,727 vs 1,737).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌30% higher power demand at 65W vs 50W.

Xeon L5335

2007

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 65W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $380 MSRP, while Phenom II X4 900e mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon L5335 better than Phenom II X4 900e?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L5335 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Phenom II X4 900e is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon L5335 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon L5335 is the better buy right now. Xeon L5335 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $380 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Phenom II X4 900e is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Phenom II X4 900e makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Phenom II X4 900e vs Xeon L5335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Phenom II X4 900e

The Phenom II X4 900e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,727 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon L5335

The Xeon L5335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 August 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,737 points. Launch price was $380.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Phenom II X4 900e and Xeon L5335 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Phenom II X4 900e versus 2 GHz on the Xeon L5335 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 900e (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Phenom II X4 900e uses the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon L5335 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X4 900e scores 1,727 against the Xeon L5335's 1,737 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon L5335. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 900e vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L5335.

Feature	Phenom II X4 900e	Xeon L5335
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+20%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+20%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB L2 Cache+33%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	4 MB (total)+700%
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Deneb (2009−2011)	Clovertown (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,727	1,737

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X4 900e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon L5335 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.