Phenom II X4 925
VS
Athlon II X4 638

Phenom II X4 925 vs Athlon II X4 638

AMD

Phenom II X4 925

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009
VS
AMD

Athlon II X4 638

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X4 925 is positioned at rank 279 and the Athlon II X4 638 is on rank 1040, so the Phenom II X4 925 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 925

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4136%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
3908%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
2837%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
855%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
677%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
592%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
339%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
335%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
305%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
305%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
301%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
293%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
289%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
288%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
285%
#262
Core i7-11700
MSRP: $323|Avg: $274
100%
#263
Core i9-13900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $570
99%
#264
Processor 300T
MSRP: $82|Avg: $82
98%
#265
Athlon 3000G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $60
98%
#266
Athlon 220GE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $60
98%
#267
Ryzen 9 3900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $441
98%
#268
Core i5-10500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $178
97%
#269
Celeron G6900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
97%
#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
97%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
97%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
97%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
96%
#279
Phenom II X4 925
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#282
PRO A12-9800
MSRP: $110|Avg: $55
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 638

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
41396%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
39116%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
28401%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8556%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6777%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5929%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3396%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3351%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3052%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3051%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3017%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2936%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2895%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2883%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2857%
#1040
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
100%
#1041
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
100%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
98%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
97%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
96%
#1046
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
95%
#1047
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
94%
#1048
Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
93%
#1049
Core 2 Quad Q9450
MSRP: $316|Avg: $15
93%
#1050
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
92%
#1051
Core 2 Duo E6320
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
91%
#1052
Core i7-980X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
91%
#1053
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
90%
#1054
Core 2 Duo E6420
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
90%
#1055
Phenom X4 9600B
MSRP: $278|Avg: $20
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Phenom II X4 925 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Athlon II X4 638 in both compute-intensive tasks (0% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPhenom II X4 925Athlon II X4 638
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($280)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Deneb (2009−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPhenom II X4 925Athlon II X4 638
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($280)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X4 925 and Athlon II X4 638

AMD

Phenom II X4 925

The Phenom II X4 925 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,261 points. Launch price was $160.

AMD

Athlon II X4 638

The Athlon II X4 638 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,260 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Phenom II X4 925 and Athlon II X4 638 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X4 925 versus 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X4 638 — a 3.6% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 925 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Phenom II X4 925 uses the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon II X4 638 uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X4 925 scores 2,261 against the Athlon II X4 638's 2,260 — a 0% lead for the Phenom II X4 925. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 925 vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 638.

FeaturePhenom II X4 925Athlon II X4 638
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+4%
2.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+4%
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Deneb (2009−2011)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
2,261
2,260
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X4 925 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X4 638 uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom II X4 925Athlon II X4 638
Socket
AM3
FM1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16