Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) vs Core 2 Duo T7700
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
Core 2 Duo T7700
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) is positioned at rank 240 and the Core 2 Duo T7700 is on rank 484, so the Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7700
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) | Core 2 Duo T7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Deneb (2009−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) | Core 2 Duo T7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) and Core 2 Duo T7700
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
The Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,544 points. Launch price was $149.
Core 2 Duo T7700
The Core 2 Duo T7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,554 points. Launch price was $307.
Processing Power
The Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T7700 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) versus 2.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7700 — a 34.5% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) uses the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7700 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) scores 2,544 against the Core 2 Duo T7700's 2,554 — a 0.4% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7700. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7700.
| Feature | Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) | Core 2 Duo T7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+42% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+42% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 4 MB+700% |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Deneb (2009−2011) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 2,544 | 2,554 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 254 |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7700 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) | Core 2 Duo T7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7700). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7700 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7700 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5000+.
| Feature | Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) | Core 2 Duo T7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) and Core 2 Duo T7700
