Phenom II X4 B95 vs Core i7-2620M
Phenom II X4 B95
Core i7-2620M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X4 B95 is positioned at rank 254 and the Core i7-2620M is on rank 1162, so the Phenom II X4 B95 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 B95
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2620M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Phenom II X4 B95 | Core i7-2620M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($346) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Deneb (2009−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Phenom II X4 B95 | Core i7-2620M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($346) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X4 B95 and Core i7-2620M
Phenom II X4 B95
The Phenom II X4 B95 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,427 points. Launch price was $80.
Core i7-2620M
The Core i7-2620M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,424 points. Launch price was $346.
Processing Power
The Phenom II X4 B95 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-2620M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 B95 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Phenom II X4 B95 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-2620M — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-2620M (base: 3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Phenom II X4 B95 uses the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i7-2620M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X4 B95 scores 2,427 against the Core i7-2620M's 2,424 — a 0.1% lead for the Phenom II X4 B95. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 B95 vs 4 MB on the Core i7-2620M.
| Feature | Phenom II X4 B95 | Core i7-2620M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+11% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Deneb (2009−2011) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,427 | 2,424 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 509 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,222 |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom II X4 B95 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-2620M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Phenom II X4 B95 | Core i7-2620M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Phenom II X4 B95) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-2620M). The Core i7-2620M includes integrated graphics (HD 3000), while the Phenom II X4 B95 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2620M targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i7-2620M rivals Core i5-2410M.
| Feature | Phenom II X4 B95 | Core i7-2620M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD 3000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Phenom II X4 B95 and Core i7-2620M
