
Phenom II X4 B95

Xeon X5450
Phenom II X4 B95 vs Xeon X5450 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Phenom II X4 B95 vs Xeon X5450 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Phenom II X4 B95 vs Xeon X5450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Phenom II X4 B95
2009Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 120W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5450 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
Xeon X5450
2007Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,416 vs 2,427).
- ❌26.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 95W.
Quick Answers
So, is Phenom II X4 B95 better than Xeon X5450?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Phenom II X4 B95 vs Xeon X5450 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Phenom II X4 B95
The Phenom II X4 B95 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,427 points. Launch price was $80.

Xeon X5450
The Xeon X5450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,416 points. Launch price was $851.
Processing Power
Both the Phenom II X4 B95 and Xeon X5450 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Phenom II X4 B95 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon X5450 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Phenom II X4 B95 uses the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon X5450 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X4 B95 scores 2,427 against the Xeon X5450's 2,416 — a 0.5% lead for the Phenom II X4 B95. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 B95 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5450.
| Feature | Phenom II X4 B95 | Xeon X5450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 12 MB L2 Cache+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 6 MB (total)+1100% |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Deneb (2009−2011) | Harpertown (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 2,427 | 2,416 |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom II X4 B95 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5450 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Phenom II X4 B95 | Xeon X5450 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















