Core m3-7Y30 vs Phenom II X4 B95

Core m3-7Y30 vs Phenom II X4 B95 Performance Spectrum

Core m3-7Y30

2 / 4

2,418

0.0%

2,427

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core m3-7Y30 vs Phenom II X4 B95 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core m3-7Y30 vs Phenom II X4 B95: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core m3-7Y30

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 5W instead of 95W, a 91W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 615, while Phenom II X4 B95 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,418 vs 2,427).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Phenom II X4 B95 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Phenom II X4 B95

2009

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2011.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 4.5W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core m3-7Y30 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom II X4 B95 better than Core m3-7Y30?

Yes. Phenom II X4 B95 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Phenom II X4 B95 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 B95 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom II X4 B95 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Phenom II X4 B95 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core m3-7Y30 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 1.4% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core m3-7Y30 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core m3-7Y30 vs Phenom II X4 B95 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core m3-7Y30

The Core m3-7Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,418 points. Launch price was $281.

Phenom II X4 B95

The Phenom II X4 B95 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,427 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core m3-7Y30 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X4 B95 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 B95 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core m3-7Y30 versus 3 GHz on the Phenom II X4 B95 — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 B95 (base: 1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core m3-7Y30 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X4 B95 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core m3-7Y30 scores 2,418 against the Phenom II X4 B95's 2,427 — a 0.4% lead for the Phenom II X4 B95. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core m3-7Y30 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 B95.

Feature	Core m3-7Y30	Phenom II X4 B95
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	3 GHz+15%
Base Clock	1 GHz	3 GHz+200%
L3 Cache	4 MB	6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,418	2,427
Cinebench R23 Multi	645	—
Geekbench 6 Single	768	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,481	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m3-7Y30 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X4 B95 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core m3-7Y30	Phenom II X4 B95
Socket	FCBGA1515	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	10	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core m3-7Y30) / not specified (Phenom II X4 B95). The Core m3-7Y30 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 615), while the Phenom II X4 B95 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core m3-7Y30 targets Ultra-portable.