Atom C3558
VS
Core m3-7Y30

Atom C3558 vs Core m3-7Y30

Intel

Atom C3558

4 Cores4 Thrd16 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core m3-7Y30

2 Cores4 Thrd4.5 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom C3558 is positioned at rank 365 and the Core m3-7Y30 is on rank 1116, so the Atom C3558 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3558

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5129%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
968%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
860%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
665%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
100%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
99%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
98%
#261
Xeon w3-2435
MSRP: $669|Avg: $790
98%
#365
Atom C3558
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#367
Xeon E5-1410
MSRP: $120|Avg: $55
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core m3-7Y30

#1104
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3412%
#1105
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3362%
#1106
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3086%
#1107
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3072%
#1108
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3044%
#1110
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2940%
#1111
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2819%
#1112
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2814%
#1113
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2738%
#1116
Core m3-7Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1117
Pentium 977
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
100%
#1118
Core i7-2715QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $50
99%
#1119
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
97%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
96%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
96%
#1127
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
95%
#1128
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
95%
#1129
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
95%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
95%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3558 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom C3558Core m3-7Y30
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core m3-7Y30 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom C3558Core m3-7Y30
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3558 and Core m3-7Y30

Intel

Atom C3558

The Atom C3558 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 16 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,431 points. Launch price was $86.

Intel

Core m3-7Y30

The Core m3-7Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,418 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The Atom C3558 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core m3-7Y30 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3558 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3558 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core m3-7Y30 — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core m3-7Y30 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Atom C3558 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core m3-7Y30 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3558 scores 2,431 against the Core m3-7Y30's 2,418 — a 0.5% lead for the Atom C3558. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Atom C3558 vs 4 MB on the Core m3-7Y30.

FeatureAtom C3558Core m3-7Y30
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.6 GHz+18%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+120%
1 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB+100%
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB+1500%
512 kB
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
2,431
2,418
Cinebench R23 Multi
645
Geekbench 6 Single
768
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,481
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3558 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m3-7Y30 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Atom C3558 versus LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600 on the Core m3-7Y30 — the Atom C3558 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3558 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Atom C3558) vs 10 (Core m3-7Y30) — the Atom C3558 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3558) and Kaby Lake-Y SoC (Core m3-7Y30).

FeatureAtom C3558Core m3-7Y30
Socket
FCBGA1310
FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133+33%
LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+1500%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12+20%
10
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom C3558) / VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core m3-7Y30). The Core m3-7Y30 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 615), while the Atom C3558 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core m3-7Y30 targets Ultra-portable.

FeatureAtom C3558Core m3-7Y30
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 615
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use
Ultra-portable