
Atom C3558

Core 2 Duo P7550
Atom C3558 vs Core 2 Duo P7550 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom C3558 vs Core 2 Duo P7550 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom C3558 vs Core 2 Duo P7550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom C3558
2017Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,431 vs 2,439).
- ❌433.3% higher power demand at 16W vs 3W.
Core 2 Duo P7550
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 3W instead of 16W, a 13W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo P7550 better than Atom C3558?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom C3558 vs Core 2 Duo P7550 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom C3558
The Atom C3558 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 16 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,431 points. Launch price was $86.

Core 2 Duo P7550
The Core 2 Duo P7550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,439 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The Atom C3558 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo P7550 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Atom C3558 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3558 versus 2.26 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P7550 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo P7550 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The Atom C3558 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo P7550 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3558 scores 2,431 against the Core 2 Duo P7550's 2,439 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo P7550. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Atom C3558 vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P7550.
| Feature | Atom C3558 | Core 2 Duo P7550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.26 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.26 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB+167% | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+167% | 3 MB |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Goldmont (2016−2017) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,431 | 2,439 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom C3558 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo P7550 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Atom C3558 | Core 2 Duo P7550 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1310 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













