Atom C3558
VS
Xeon E5606

Atom C3558 vs Xeon E5606

Intel

Atom C3558

4 Cores4 Thrd16 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Xeon E5606

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 0.13 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom C3558 is positioned at rank 365 and the Xeon E5606 is on rank 802, so the Atom C3558 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3558

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5129%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
968%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
860%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
665%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
100%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
99%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
98%
#261
Xeon w3-2435
MSRP: $669|Avg: $790
98%
#365
Atom C3558
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#367
Xeon E5-1410
MSRP: $120|Avg: $55
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5606

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
17007%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3211%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2853%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2204%
#460
Xeon E5-2686 V3
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $160
99%
#460
Xeon Gold 6242R
MSRP: $2977|Avg: $779
99%
#462
Xeon W-2175
MSRP: $1947|Avg: $180
99%
#463
EPYC 75F3
MSRP: $5383|Avg: $2799
98%
#464
Xeon W-3375
MSRP: $4951|Avg: $6000
98%
#802
Xeon E5606
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#803
Opteron 6380
MSRP: $551|Avg: $111
99%
#812
Xeon E3-1220L
MSRP: $189|Avg: $27
98%
#815
Xeon X3450
MSRP: $241|Avg: $39
98%
#817
Xeon W3680
MSRP: $594|Avg: $26
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3558 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom C3558Xeon E5606
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5606 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom C3558Xeon E5606
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3558 and Xeon E5606

Intel

Atom C3558

The Atom C3558 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 16 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,431 points. Launch price was $86.

Intel

Xeon E5606

The Xeon E5606 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,443 points. Launch price was $46.

Processing Power

Both the Atom C3558 and Xeon E5606 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3558 versus 0.13 GHz on the Xeon E5606 — a 177.7% clock advantage for the Atom C3558 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Atom C3558 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5606 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3558 scores 2,431 against the Xeon E5606's 2,443 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5606. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Atom C3558 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E5606.

FeatureAtom C3558Xeon E5606
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz+1592%
0.13 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+3%
2.13 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
8 MB+3100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark
2,431
2,443
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3558 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5606 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom C3558Xeon E5606
Socket
FCBGA1310
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12