A4-5150M vs Atom C3558

A4-5150M vs Atom C3558 Performance Spectrum

A4-5150M

2 / 2

2,446

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom C3558

4 / 4

2,431

0.0%

Core i3-4010Y

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

Pentium Dual Core T2410

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-5150M vs Atom C3558 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-5150M vs Atom C3558: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-5150M

2013

Why buy it

✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8350G, while Atom C3558 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌118.8% higher power demand at 35W vs 16W.

Atom C3558

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 16W instead of 35W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,431 vs 2,446).
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-5150M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-5150M better than Atom C3558?

Yes. A4-5150M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4-5150M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-5150M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-5150M still makes the most sense overall. A4-5150M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom C3558 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-5150M vs Atom C3558 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-5150M

The A4-5150M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,446 points. Launch price was $50.

Atom C3558

The Atom C3558 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 16 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,431 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-5150M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Atom C3558 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3558 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the A4-5150M versus 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3558 — a 40% clock advantage for the A4-5150M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The A4-5150M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom C3558 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A4-5150M scores 2,446 against the Atom C3558's 2,431 — a 0.6% lead for the A4-5150M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-5150M vs 8 MB on the Atom C3558.

Feature	A4-5150M	Atom C3558
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+50%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+23%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	8 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+6300%	8 MB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Goldmont (2016−2017)
PassMark	2,446	2,431
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-5150M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom C3558 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4-5150M versus DDR4-2133 on the Atom C3558 — the Atom C3558 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3558 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4-5150M) vs 12 (Atom C3558) — the A4-5150M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4-5150M	Atom C3558
Socket	FS1r2	FCBGA1310
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	256 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-5150M) / not specified (Atom C3558). The A4-5150M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8350G), while the Atom C3558 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5150M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-5150M rivals Pentium 2020M.