Atom C3558 vs Core i5-4350U

Intel

Atom C3558

4 Cores4 Thrd16 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-4350U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Atom C3558 vs Core i5-4350U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom C3558 vs Core i5-4350U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom C3558 vs Core i5-4350U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom C3558

2017

Why buy it

  • +0.2% higher PassMark.
  • +166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
  • Draws 16W instead of 512W, a 496W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i5-4350U

2013

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (2,425 vs 2,431).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
    • 3100% higher power demand at 512W vs 16W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Atom C3558 better than Core i5-4350U?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-4350U is ahead with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom C3558 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Atom C3558 also has the bigger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom C3558 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Atom C3558 still makes the most sense overall. Atom C3558 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Atom C3558 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013), 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Atom C3558 vs Core i5-4350U Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Atom C3558

    The Atom C3558 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 16 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,431 points. Launch price was $86.

    Intel

    Core i5-4350U

    The Core i5-4350U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,425 points. Launch price was $342.

    Processing Power

    The Atom C3558 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4350U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3558 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3558 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-4350U — a 27.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-4350U (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Atom C3558 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-4350U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3558 scores 2,431 against the Core i5-4350U's 2,425 — a 0.2% lead for the Atom C3558. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Atom C3558 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4350U.

    FeatureAtom C3558Core i5-4350U
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4+100%
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    2.2 GHz
    2.9 GHz+32%
    Base Clock
    2.2 GHz+57%
    1.4 GHz
    L3 Cache
    8 MB+167%
    3 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    8 MB
    256K (per core)+3100%
    Process
    14 nm-36%
    22 nm
    Architecture
    Goldmont (2016−2017)
    Haswell (2013−2015)
    PassMark
    2,431
    2,425
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Atom C3558 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4350U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAtom C3558Core i5-4350U
    Socket
    FCBGA1310
    FCBGA1168
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR4-2133
    Max RAM Capacity
    256 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    12