Atom C3558 vs Core i7-4610Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom C3558 vs Core i7-4610Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom C3558 vs Core i7-4610Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom C3558

2017

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 16W instead of 512W, a 496W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,431 vs 2,446).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4610Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-4610Y

2013

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4200, while Atom C3558 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌3100% higher power demand at 512W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4610Y better than Atom C3558?

Yes. Core i7-4610Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4610Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4610Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4610Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-4610Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom C3558 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013) and 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom C3558 vs Core i7-4610Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom C3558

The Atom C3558 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 16 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,431 points. Launch price was $86.

Core i7-4610Y

The Core i7-4610Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,446 points. Launch price was $415.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom C3558 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-4610Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3558 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3558 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-4610Y — a 27.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-4610Y (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Atom C3558 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4610Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3558 scores 2,431 against the Core i7-4610Y's 2,446 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-4610Y. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Atom C3558 vs 4 MB on the Core i7-4610Y.

Feature	Atom C3558	Core i7-4610Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	2.9 GHz+32%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+29%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB+100%	4 MB
L2 Cache	8 MB+1500%	512 kB
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Goldmont (2016−2017)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,431	2,446
Geekbench 6 Single	—	700
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,350

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3558 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4610Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Atom C3558 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-4610Y — the Atom C3558 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3558 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 12 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3558) and Haswell Y (Core i7-4610Y).

Feature	Atom C3558	Core i7-4610Y
Socket	FCBGA1310	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+33%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB+1500%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	12	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom C3558) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4610Y). The Core i7-4610Y includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4200), while the Atom C3558 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4610Y targets Ultrabook/Tablet.