Core i7-2620M vs Phenom II X4 B95

Core i7-2620M vs Phenom II X4 B95 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-2620M

2 / 4

2,424

0.0%

2,427

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-2620M vs Phenom II X4 B95 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-2620M vs Phenom II X4 B95: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-2620M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD 3000, while Phenom II X4 B95 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,424 vs 2,427).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $346 MSRP, while Phenom II X4 B95 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Phenom II X4 B95

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2620M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-2620M better than Phenom II X4 B95?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-2620M is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 B95 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Phenom II X4 B95 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 B95 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-2620M is the better buy right now. Core i7-2620M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $346 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Phenom II X4 B95 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-2620M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-2620M vs Phenom II X4 B95 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2620M

The Core i7-2620M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,424 points. Launch price was $346.

Phenom II X4 B95

The Phenom II X4 B95 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,427 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-2620M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X4 B95 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 B95 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-2620M versus 3 GHz on the Phenom II X4 B95 — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-2620M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-2620M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Phenom II X4 B95 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2620M scores 2,424 against the Phenom II X4 B95's 2,427 — a 0.1% lead for the Phenom II X4 B95. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-2620M vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 B95.

Feature	Core i7-2620M	Phenom II X4 B95
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+13%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	4 MB	6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,424	2,427
Geekbench 6 Single	509	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,222	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2620M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X4 B95 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-2620M	Phenom II X4 B95
Socket	PGA988	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-2620M) / not specified (Phenom II X4 B95). The Core i7-2620M includes integrated graphics (HD 3000), while the Phenom II X4 B95 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2620M targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i7-2620M rivals Core i5-2410M.