Core i7-2620M vs Core i7-2640M

Intel

Core i7-2620M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-2640M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-2620M vs Core i7-2640M Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-2620M vs Core i7-2640M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-2620M vs Core i7-2640M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-2620M

2011

Why buy it

  • +3.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (509 vs 563).

Core i7-2640M

2011

Why buy it

  • +10.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,184 vs 1,222).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-2640M better than Core i7-2620M?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-2640M is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-2620M pulls ahead with 3.2% better Geekbench multi-core.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-2620M is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-2640M is the better buy right now. Core i7-2640M comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $346 MSRP versus $346 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i7-2620M is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 3.2% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 0.9% better value on MSRP (7.1 vs 7.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-2620M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-2620M vs Core i7-2640M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-2620M

The Core i7-2620M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,424 points. Launch price was $346.

Intel

Core i7-2640M

The Core i7-2640M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,445 points. Launch price was $346.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-2620M and Core i7-2640M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-2620M versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-2640M — a 2.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-2640M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i7-2620M scores 2,424 against the Core i7-2640M's 2,445 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-2640M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 509 vs 563, a 10.1% lead for the Core i7-2640M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,222 vs 1,184 (3.2% advantage for the Core i7-2620M). Both processors carry 4 MB of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-2620MCore i7-2640M
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
2.8 GHz+4%
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
2,424
2,445
Geekbench 6 Single
509
563+11%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,222+3%
1,184
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA988 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,QM67,HM67,QS67 (Core i7-2620M) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2640M).

FeatureCore i7-2620MCore i7-2640M
Socket
PGA988
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-2620M) vs true (Core i7-2640M). Both include integrated graphics HD 3000 (Core i7-2620M) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2640M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2620M targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i7-2620M rivals Core i5-2410M; Core i7-2640M rivals Phenom II Black Edition N660.

FeatureCore i7-2620MCore i7-2640M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD 3000
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-2620M was priced at $346, while the Core i7-2640M came in at $346. On launch pricing ($346 vs $346), Core i7-2640M was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-2620M delivers 7.0 pts/$ vs 7.1 pts/$ for the Core i7-2640M — making the Core i7-2640M the 0.9% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-2620MCore i7-2640M
MSRP
$346
$346
Performance per Dollar
7.0
7.1+1%
Release Date
2011
2011

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.