Core i7-2620M vs Core i7-4610Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-2620M vs Core i7-4610Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-2620M vs Core i7-4610Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-2620M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (509 vs 700).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,222 vs 1,350).
❌Launch MSRP is still $346 MSRP, while Core i7-4610Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i7-4610Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+37.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4610Y better than Core i7-2620M?

Yes. Core i7-4610Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 10.5% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.9% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4610Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4610Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 10.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4610Y is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-4610Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $346 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-2620M only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (7.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4610Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-2620M vs Core i7-4610Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2620M

The Core i7-2620M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,424 points. Launch price was $346.

Core i7-4610Y

The Core i7-4610Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,446 points. Launch price was $415.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-2620M and Core i7-4610Y share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-2620M versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-4610Y — a 15.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-2620M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i7-2620M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-4610Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2620M scores 2,424 against the Core i7-4610Y's 2,446 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-4610Y. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 509 vs 700, a 31.6% lead for the Core i7-4610Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,222 vs 1,350 (10% advantage for the Core i7-4610Y). Both processors carry 4 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-2620M	Core i7-4610Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+17%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+59%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	4 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,424	2,446
Geekbench 6 Single	509	700+38%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,222	1,350+10%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2620M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-4610Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-2620M versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-4610Y — the Core i7-4610Y supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-2620M) vs 12 (Core i7-4610Y) — the Core i7-2620M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,QM67,HM67,QS67 (Core i7-2620M) and Haswell Y (Core i7-4610Y).

Feature	Core i7-2620M	Core i7-4610Y
Socket	PGA988	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3L-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD 3000 (Core i7-2620M) and Intel HD Graphics 4200 (Core i7-4610Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2620M targets Budget, Core i7-4610Y targets Ultrabook/Tablet. Direct competitor: Core i7-2620M rivals Core i5-2410M.