Phenom II X6 1065T vs Athlon X4 860K
Phenom II X6 1065T
Athlon X4 860K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X6 1065T is positioned at rank 1030 and the Athlon X4 860K is on rank 480, so the Athlon X4 860K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X6 1065T
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 860K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Phenom II X6 1065T | Athlon X4 860K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($170) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Thuban (2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Phenom II X6 1065T | Athlon X4 860K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+753%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($170) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X6 1065T and Athlon X4 860K
Phenom II X6 1065T
The Phenom II X6 1065T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,412 points. Launch price was $149.
Athlon X4 860K
The Athlon X4 860K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,425 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Phenom II X6 1065T packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Athlon X4 860K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X6 1065T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1065T versus 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 860K — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 860K (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Phenom II X6 1065T uses the Thuban (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon X4 860K uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X6 1065T scores 3,412 against the Athlon X4 860K's 3,425 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon X4 860K.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1065T | Athlon X4 860K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6+50% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 4 MB+700% |
| Process | 45 nm | 28 nm-38% |
| Architecture | Thuban (2010) | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,412 | 3,425 |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom II X6 1065T uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X4 860K uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1065T | Athlon X4 860K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | FM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Value Analysis
The Phenom II X6 1065T launched at $426 MSRP, while the Athlon X4 860K debuted at $80. At current prices ($170 vs $20), the Athlon X4 860K is $150 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Phenom II X6 1065T delivers 20.1 pts/$ vs 171.3 pts/$ for the Athlon X4 860K — making the Athlon X4 860K the 158% better value option.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1065T | Athlon X4 860K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $426 | $80-81% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $170 | $20-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.1 | 171.3+752% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Phenom II X6 1065T and Athlon X4 860K
