Phenom II X6 1065T vs Core i3-4150
Phenom II X6 1065T
Core i3-4150
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X6 1065T is positioned at rank 1030 and the Core i3-4150 is on rank 960, so the Core i3-4150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X6 1065T
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4150
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Phenom II X6 1065T | Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($170) | ✅ More affordable ($70) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Thuban (2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Phenom II X6 1065T | Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+142%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($170) | ✅ More affordable ($70) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X6 1065T and Core i3-4150
Phenom II X6 1065T
The Phenom II X6 1065T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,412 points. Launch price was $149.
Core i3-4150
The Core i3-4150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,406 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Phenom II X6 1065T packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Core i3-4150 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X6 1065T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1065T versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-4150 — a 2.9% clock advantage for the Core i3-4150 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Phenom II X6 1065T uses the Thuban (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-4150 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X6 1065T scores 3,412 against the Core i3-4150's 3,406 — a 0.2% lead for the Phenom II X6 1065T. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1065T vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4150.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1065T | Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6+200% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.5 GHz+21% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+100% | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Thuban (2010) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,412 | 3,406 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,071 |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom II X6 1065T uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4150 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1065T | Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Phenom II X6 1065T) / VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4150). The Core i3-4150 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Phenom II X6 1065T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4150 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-4150 rivals FX-6300.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1065T | Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 4400 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Budget Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Phenom II X6 1065T launched at $426 MSRP, while the Core i3-4150 debuted at $281. At current prices ($170 vs $70), the Core i3-4150 is $100 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Phenom II X6 1065T delivers 20.1 pts/$ vs 48.7 pts/$ for the Core i3-4150 — making the Core i3-4150 the 83.2% better value option.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1065T | Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $426 | $281-34% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $170 | $70-59% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.1 | 48.7+142% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Phenom II X6 1065T and Core i3-4150
