CPU
GPU
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Core i7-3920XM
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is positioned at rank 22 and the Core i7-3920XM is on rank 582, so the Phenom II X6 1100T BE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3920XM
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Core i7-3920XM |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($265) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Thuban (2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Core i7-3920XM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($265) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Core i7-3920XM
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,745 points. Launch price was $149.
Core i7-3920XM
The Core i7-3920XM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,713 points. Launch price was $1,096.
Processing Power
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Core i7-3920XM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Phenom II X6 1100T BE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-3920XM — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-3920XM (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses the Thuban (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i7-3920XM uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X6 1100T BE scores 5,745 against the Core i7-3920XM's 5,713 — a 0.6% lead for the Phenom II X6 1100T BE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 508 vs 686, a 29.8% lead for the Core i7-3920XM that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-3920XM.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Core i7-3920XM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+14% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Thuban (2010) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 5,745 | 5,713 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 508 | 686+35% |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-3920XM uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD 870,880G,890FX,970,990FX (Phenom II X6 1100T BE) and HM77,QM77 (Core i7-3920XM).
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Core i7-3920XM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1100T BE) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3920XM). The Core i7-3920XM includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Phenom II X6 1100T BE targets Enthusiast Legacy, Core i7-3920XM targets Extreme Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3920XM rivals A10-5750M.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Core i7-3920XM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 4000 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Enthusiast Legacy | Extreme Performance Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Core i7-3920XM
