
Phenom II X6 1100T BE

Xeon X5650
Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs Xeon X5650 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs Xeon X5650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs Xeon X5650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon X5650.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5650 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5650, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $265 MSRP, while Xeon X5650 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌31.6% higher power demand at 125W vs 95W.
Xeon X5650
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 125W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,742 vs 5,745).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
Quick Answers
So, is Phenom II X6 1100T BE better than Xeon X5650?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs Xeon X5650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,745 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon X5650
The Xeon X5650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.06 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,742 points. Launch price was $53.
Processing Power
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE packs 6 cores / 6 threads, matching the Xeon X5650's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE versus 3.06 GHz on the Xeon X5650 — a 18.9% clock advantage for the Phenom II X6 1100T BE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses the Thuban (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon X5650 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X6 1100T BE scores 5,745 against the Xeon X5650's 5,742 — a 0.1% lead for the Phenom II X6 1100T BE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5650.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon X5650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+21% | 3.06 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+24% | 2.66 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Thuban (2010) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 5,745 | 5,742 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 508 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5650 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 memory speed. Memory channels: 2 (Phenom II X6 1100T BE) vs 3 (Xeon X5650). Chipset compatibility: AMD 870,880G,890FX,970,990FX (Phenom II X6 1100T BE) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5650).
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon X5650 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 5.0+150% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 3+50% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Only the Phenom II X6 1100T BE has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1100T BE) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5650). Primary use case: Phenom II X6 1100T BE targets Enthusiast Legacy, Xeon X5650 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5650 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon X5650 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Enthusiast Legacy | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















