Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs Xeon E3-1225 v6

Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs Xeon E3-1225 v6 Performance Spectrum

Phenom II X6 1100T BE

6 / 6

5,745

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1225 v6

4 / 4

5,740

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs Xeon E3-1225 v6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs Xeon E3-1225 v6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E3-1225 v6.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1225 v6 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $265 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1225 v6 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌71.2% higher power demand at 125W vs 73W.

Xeon E3-1225 v6

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 73W instead of 125W, a 52W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,740 vs 5,745).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1225 v6 better than Phenom II X6 1100T BE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1225 v6 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Phenom II X6 1100T BE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X6 1100T BE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1225 v6 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E3-1225 v6 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $265 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Phenom II X6 1100T BE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (21.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1225 v6 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2010) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs Xeon E3-1225 v6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE

The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,745 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1225 v6

The Xeon E3-1225 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,740 points. Launch price was $213.

⚡

Processing Power

The Phenom II X6 1100T BE packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon E3-1225 v6 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X6 1100T BE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1225 v6 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses the Thuban (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon E3-1225 v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X6 1100T BE scores 5,745 against the Xeon E3-1225 v6's 5,740 — a 0.1% lead for the Phenom II X6 1100T BE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1225 v6.

Feature	Phenom II X6 1100T BE	Xeon E3-1225 v6
Cores / Threads	6 / 6+50%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB+33%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB+100%
Process	45 nm	14 nm-69%
Architecture	Thuban (2010)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	5,745	5,740
Geekbench 6 Single	508	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1225 v6 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Phenom II X6 1100T BE	Xeon E3-1225 v6
Socket	AM3	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1100T BE) / not specified (Xeon E3-1225 v6). Primary use case: Phenom II X6 1100T BE targets Enthusiast Legacy.